Posted 6 hours ago
Posted 6 hours ago
Posted 6 hours ago
Posted 7 hours ago

Here's what John K just told me

happyd00dle:

  1. Study construction; draw toys to strengthen your understanding of construction
  2. Draw many caricatures; it forces you to be observant. But draw what you see rather than drawing what Al Hirschfeld or what Milt Kahl see. Drop everything and draw from your eyes
  3. Do not repeat yourself; always…
Posted 8 hours ago

brianmichaelbendis:

1990 - Anatomy of a Cover - Critical Mass #1 by Mike Mignola

(Source: marvel1980s)

Posted 8 hours ago

wintry-mix:

success-is-my-goal:

ronnieisnotamazing:

SO HE WAS HOT THE WHOLE TIME AND WE JUST DIDN’T KNOW IT.

WHAT

Citizens of the world, we have been deceived.

(Source: i-am-a-snitch)

Posted 8 hours ago

vacuumcleanest:

fma day yeahyeahyeah….

Posted 8 hours ago

otherbully1:

fckyeahsheamus:

Wtf lmao aw he cares about kids

well it’s one thing to be a criminal, it’s another to be actual fucking scum. 

Good for him

(Source: thedeathmerchant)

Posted 9 hours ago

amazonpoodle:

theinfernalcakewalk:

combatbrodom:

sweaterkittensahoy:

The premise of the film project is simple: a woman is asked to read an excerpt from a personally elected body of literature. (x)

It’s called “Hysterical Literature,” and I have never seen a better example of questioning why it is that educated women (whether self or otherwise) always seem to be showcased as having no interest in sex. They all choose interesting books, and they all get off, and it’s fabulous.

It’s also brought forth a lot of comments (on youtube and otherwise) and WHY WOULD SOMEONE DO THIS. IT’S SO DIRTY, and I feel that’s part of the point: Why is this considered so scandalous? It’s just sex. In fact, we don’t even SEE the sex, so the only thing that could be making people uncomfortable while watching it seems to be watching a woman enjoying getting sexual pleasure.

And maybe some of those people just aren’t into voyeurism  and that’s cool. But I’m betting a lot of them just don’t like to consider that maybe they think women having sexual pleasure is weird and that they think that you can’t have sexual pleasure as a woman and also have other facets and appreciation for “finer things.”

What I’m saying is, this whole series gives me a lot of thoughts.

Always reblog because Hysterical Literature is the sexiest thing I’ve seen in a long while. 

Pretty sure I’ll wanna watch this later soooo

I think some reasons for why the people who probably do watch porn are made so uncomfortable by Hysterical Literature are a little more involved, since there’s definitely a decent market for porn in which women masturbate solo. It’s not JUST that each woman is experiencing sexual pleasure, it’s the combination of a bunch of aspects that are specific to this series:

  • each woman is without a partner, so she’s not servicing anyone;
  • she’s without a partner, so her attention is focused inward — this is completely about her enjoyment only;
  • she’s without a partner, but she does have a vibrator and her own body, so she isn’t dependent on any other human for her orgasm;
  • she’s reading a selection of her own aloud with some serious dedication, demonstrating that there are things she finds just as interesting as sex;
  • we don’t get any of the visuals or the melodrama or the POV that are usually considered to be the point of porn, so we can’t be titillated by her body (or her partner’s body/actions, or her reactions to her partner’s body/actions) — we don’t get to see what’s causing her pleasure, we only see how it makes her feel.

The whole production is actually super-dismissive of mainstream (straight) porn and its primary audience (dudes), in that it’s not particularly staged for the viewer’s pleasure (there’s no pretense that there isn’t a viewer — it’s just not about them) unless the viewer happens to be a person who gets off on the idea of women having some fantastic selfish orgasms, even when the viewer is in no way invited to imagine themselves participating. :D

FANTASTIC.

I did not know I wanted this is my life

(Source: feyminism)

Posted 10 hours ago
then-i-met-fandom:

little-lark:

thesp00ky:

jobforawhatlord:

darrynek:

is this supposed to change my mind because it didn’t



IT IS NOT FUCKING JIF IF YOU TELL ME YOU PRONOUNCE IT THAT WAY I WILL LAUGH IN YOUR GODDAMN FACE BECAUSE GIF STANDS FOR “GRAPHICS INTERCHANGE FORMAT” NOT FUCKING “JRAPHICS INTERCHANGE FORMAT” 

Preach

Giraffe

It has been assimilated into out language. Your argument is invalid.

then-i-met-fandom:

little-lark:

thesp00ky:

jobforawhatlord:

darrynek:

is this supposed to change my mind because it didn’t

IT IS NOT FUCKING JIF IF YOU TELL ME YOU PRONOUNCE IT THAT WAY I WILL LAUGH IN YOUR GODDAMN FACE BECAUSE GIF STANDS FOR “GRAPHICS INTERCHANGE FORMAT” NOT FUCKING “JRAPHICS INTERCHANGE FORMAT” 

Preach

Giraffe

It has been assimilated into out language. Your argument is invalid.

(Source: panerasexual)

Posted 10 hours ago

Unexplained Events That Are Blamed on Aliens

facts-and-news:

solar-powers:

that-crazy-universe:

A list of strange events that have been attributed to aliens because no other plausible explanation is available.

Unexplained Events That Are Blamed on Aliens

Were aliens behind these unexplained events? who thinks they were?

image

oh god an alien from outer space has caused all of this, it’s true. DAMN

image

omg this is creepy.
this is why i believe in this stuff. ^__^

wow #4

Posted 10 hours ago
Posted 10 hours ago

makingplansdrawingmaps:

cupcakeforger:

timetobe-me:

intellectualbadarse:

HOLY SHIT SIGNAL BOOST

SIGNAL BOOST THIS

REDDIT FOR GOOD!

This is actually true and could make a difference

This is hella important

(Source: srsfunny)

Posted 10 hours ago
Posted 10 hours ago

brianmichaelbendis:

Superman And Batman: World’s Funnest #1, November 2000, cover by Brian Bolland

(Source: comicbookcovers)